I don't know whether it is just behaving normally. But I don't get the result I want. I have a concatenate expression for a key column, which creates a unique ID from the combination of two precedent values from the dependent dropdowns list from the GR_Code and CT_Code
GR_Code values come normal. But for the CT_Code part, it brings the first value from the dependent values of GR_Codes.
CONCATENATE(GR_code],".",[CT_code],".",UNIQUEID())
Thank you for your time.
Could you share more detail, i.e. your expectations vs actual results?
The expression you shared does not give us a whole lot to work with.
Hi TeeSee1,
Thank you for your reply. I shared some pictures blow to clarify my expectation. I hope this helps.
My Configuration
A few questions.
@TeeSee1 wrote:The app formula for CT_CODE that you have is [GROUP_NAME].[GR_CODE]. Is this correct? (This cannot be right as far as I can see
I made a double and triple check, yes it is not correct. Thank you for pointing out this.
Actually, it was [GROUP_NAME].[CT_CODE] I made a mistake when editing in paint. But even that expression does not return the corresponding values. Because I have a list of the same KEY values for GROUPNAME in the grouping table.
In the product table, I want to bring a dependent dropdown list for the group and category. and yes dependent dropdown works (yey!). While typing the sentence above I found the solution and tried it and it is working as it should be.
I just needed to use an app formula for the CT_CODE column.
SELECT(CATEGORIES[CT_CODE],[_THISROW].[CT_NAME]=[CT_NAME])
Thank you for your time, sir.
User | Count |
---|---|
17 | |
12 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 |