LinkedIn
Twitter
Hello people!
I love the Estimated cost feature since its a quick way to, not only get an estimated of the cost, but to compare to past version of the same job (a historic view would be nice!).
My question is:
Mostly, the graph looks like this, which is fine:
But this other graph looks weird, don't you think?
Context:
Both graphs are from the same job but different runs.
| First one | Second one | |
| Elapsed time | Succeeded | Running |
| Elapsed time | 3 hr 59 min | 3 hr 37 min |
| machine type | n1-standard8 | n1-standard8 |
| job type | batch | batch |
| Job region | us-central1 | us-central1 |
| Dataflow Prime | Disabled | Disabled |
| Runner v2 | Enabled | Enabled |
| Dataflow Shuffle | Enabled | Enabled |
Current vCPUs | 8 | 8 |
| Total vCPU time | 63.347 vCPU hr | 27.761 vCPU hr |
| Total memory time | 237.551 GB hr | 104.188 GB hr |
| Current HDD PD | 25 GB | 25 GB |
| Total HDD PD time | 197.959 GB hr | 87.032 GB hr |
| Total Shuffle data processed | 11.62 GB | 4.88 GB |
| Billable Shuffle data processed | 2.9 GB | 1.22 GB |
