Get hands-on experience with 20+ free Google Cloud products and $300 in free credit for new customers.

Datastream concurrency issue

I'm currently using Google Cloud Datastream to replicate data from MySQL to BigQuery.
My Flow is : Mysql---->Datastream---->GCS----->Cloud function---->BigQuery
I've noticed that the time taken for data transformation and loading into GCs significantly longer compared to a setup have on AWS, where it only takes 4-5 seconds. With Datastream, this process is taking almost a minute.How we can reduce time is the maxConcurrentCdcTasks parameter useful in this case, or does it have any other impact on the stream? Are there any other options available for this?

Solved Solved
1 6 835
2 ACCEPTED SOLUTIONS

The process of replicating data from MySQL to BigQuery using Datastream involves several stages that can contribute to overall latency. The typical flow is MySQL -> Datastream -> GCS -> Cloud Function -> BigQuery. In this setup, you’ve observed a significant delay, with the entire process taking nearly a minute compared to a mere 4-5 seconds in a similar AWS setup. This essay explores the factors contributing to this delay and proposes strategies for optimization.

The observed 1-minute delay can be attributed to multiple factors. First, the transfer of data from Datastream to GCS)= can introduce latency. Datastream itself might not be the primary bottleneck, but the time taken to write data into GCS can add to the overall delay. Second, the invocation of Cloud Functions can contribute to the latency. If Cloud Functions are not running constantly, cold starts—the time taken for a Cloud Function to initialize—can add overhead. Lastly, loading data from GCS into BigQuery can take time, depending on the size of the data and the load on BigQuery at that moment.

To tackle this latency, a multi-pronged approach is necessary. One of the primary areas to optimize is Datastream itself. Adjusting the maxConcurrentCdcTasks parameter can significantly impact performance. This parameter allows Datastream to parallelize the reading of change data, potentially speeding up the initial capture process if your MySQL server can handle more concurrent tasks. Additionally, enabling batching in Datastream can improve throughput by combining multiple changes into a single GCS object, thus reducing the number of write operations. Increasing the stream buffer size can also help manage bursts of activity in the MySQL database by providing more space for Datastream to queue changes before writing them to GCS.

Optimizing Cloud Functions is another crucial step. If cold starts are contributing to the delay, implementing techniques to keep your Cloud Function warm, such as periodically pinging it with minimal requests, can help. Allocating more memory to your Cloud Function can also speed up execution and reduce latency. Furthermore, exploring ways to process data in parallel can leverage Cloud Functions’ ability to scale horizontally, dividing the work among multiple instances to improve performance.

BigQuery optimization also plays a significant role in reducing latency. If you are using streaming inserts into BigQuery, consider batch loading for larger volumes of data, as batch loading is generally more efficient for bulk data transfer. Implementing partitioning and clustering in your BigQuery tables can dramatically improve query performance and might help with load times if your data is well-organized.

In addition to these specific optimizations, several general considerations can help improve performance. Utilizing Cloud Monitoring to track metrics throughout your pipeline can identify where the most significant delays occur, allowing you to focus your optimization efforts effectively. Network latency can also be a contributing factor if your MySQL database and Google Cloud resources are in different regions. Ensuring that your resources are geographically closer to each other or exploring network optimization options can mitigate this issue. Finally, if your Cloud Function performs complex transformations, optimizing the code or offloading transformations to BigQuery using SQL can reduce processing time.

For instance, leveraging the maxConcurrentCdcTasks parameter in your Datastream configuration can provide a practical example of these optimizations. By experimenting with higher values, such as 5 or 10, and monitoring the load on your MySQL server, you can potentially speed up the initial capture process within Datastream, provided your MySQL server can handle the increased concurrency.

However, it is essential to monitor the impact of any changes on your entire system. Increasing concurrency or making other adjustments can sometimes have adverse effects if your resources are already strained. By carefully implementing and monitoring these optimizations, you should be able to reduce the latency in your data replication pipeline and achieve performance closer to your AWS setup.

View solution in original post

The inconsistency in file names within ETL processes can arise from various factors

Minimizing cold start times by keeping functions warm through periodic invocation, increasing memory allocation, and enabling parallel processing within the function can significantly improve efficiency. Additionally, using asynchronous processing where possible can enhance throughput and reduce latency.

Alternative Flow: Using Dataflow

Using Dataflow can provide a more efficient and scalable solution for your ETL pipeline. Here’s an alternative architecture:

  1. MySQL to GCS using Datastream:

    • Continue using Datastream to capture changes from MySQL and write them to GCS.

    • Ensure configurations are optimized (e.g., batch size, interval settings).

  2. GCS to Dataflow:

    • Set up a Dataflow pipeline to read files from GCS.

    • Dataflow can process the data in parallel, apply transformations, and write the results to BigQuery.

Detailed Steps

  1. Set Up Datastream:

    • Configure Datastream to capture changes from MySQL and write them to a GCS bucket.

    • Optimize Datastream settings as needed.

  2. Create a Dataflow Pipeline:

    • Dataflow can efficiently process and transform data. Here’s an example Dataflow pipeline in Python: 

      import apache_beam as beam
      from apache_beam.options.pipeline_options import PipelineOptions
      
      def process_file(element):
          # Implement your data processing logic here
          processed_element = element # Add your transformation logic
          return processed_element
      
      def run():
          pipeline_options = PipelineOptions(
              project='your-gcp-project',
              temp_location='gs://your-temp-bucket/temp',
              region='your-region'
          )
      
          with beam.Pipeline(options=pipeline_options) as p:
              (
                  p
                  | 'Read from GCS' >> beam.io.ReadFromText('gs://your-bucket/path/to/files/*')
                  | 'Process Data' >> beam.Map(process_file)
                  | 'Write to BigQuery' >> beam.io.WriteToBigQuery(
                      'your-project:your_dataset.your_table',
                      schema='SCHEMA_AUTODETECT',
                      write_disposition=beam.io.BigQueryDisposition.WRITE_APPEND
                  )
              )
      
      if __name__ == '__main__':
          run()
      
  3. Deploy and Monitor:

    • Deploy the Dataflow job and monitor it using the Dataflow console in Google Cloud.
    • Use Cloud Monitoring and Cloud Logging to keep track of the pipeline’s performance and troubleshoot any issues.

Adopting Google Cloud Dataflow for ETL tasks offers several key benefits:

Dataflow efficiently handles both batch and stream processing, ensuring the system can scale as data volumes grow without compromising performance.

Leveraging parallel processing and optimized configurations, Dataflow reduces latency, enabling quicker data transformation and loading. This results in faster access to up-to-date information, even for large datasets.

Dataflow allows for the easy implementation of complex transformations and processing logic within the pipeline. Its comprehensive features enable the design of intricate data pipelines that meet specific business needs without extensive customization.

View solution in original post

6 REPLIES 6

The process of replicating data from MySQL to BigQuery using Datastream involves several stages that can contribute to overall latency. The typical flow is MySQL -> Datastream -> GCS -> Cloud Function -> BigQuery. In this setup, you’ve observed a significant delay, with the entire process taking nearly a minute compared to a mere 4-5 seconds in a similar AWS setup. This essay explores the factors contributing to this delay and proposes strategies for optimization.

The observed 1-minute delay can be attributed to multiple factors. First, the transfer of data from Datastream to GCS)= can introduce latency. Datastream itself might not be the primary bottleneck, but the time taken to write data into GCS can add to the overall delay. Second, the invocation of Cloud Functions can contribute to the latency. If Cloud Functions are not running constantly, cold starts—the time taken for a Cloud Function to initialize—can add overhead. Lastly, loading data from GCS into BigQuery can take time, depending on the size of the data and the load on BigQuery at that moment.

To tackle this latency, a multi-pronged approach is necessary. One of the primary areas to optimize is Datastream itself. Adjusting the maxConcurrentCdcTasks parameter can significantly impact performance. This parameter allows Datastream to parallelize the reading of change data, potentially speeding up the initial capture process if your MySQL server can handle more concurrent tasks. Additionally, enabling batching in Datastream can improve throughput by combining multiple changes into a single GCS object, thus reducing the number of write operations. Increasing the stream buffer size can also help manage bursts of activity in the MySQL database by providing more space for Datastream to queue changes before writing them to GCS.

Optimizing Cloud Functions is another crucial step. If cold starts are contributing to the delay, implementing techniques to keep your Cloud Function warm, such as periodically pinging it with minimal requests, can help. Allocating more memory to your Cloud Function can also speed up execution and reduce latency. Furthermore, exploring ways to process data in parallel can leverage Cloud Functions’ ability to scale horizontally, dividing the work among multiple instances to improve performance.

BigQuery optimization also plays a significant role in reducing latency. If you are using streaming inserts into BigQuery, consider batch loading for larger volumes of data, as batch loading is generally more efficient for bulk data transfer. Implementing partitioning and clustering in your BigQuery tables can dramatically improve query performance and might help with load times if your data is well-organized.

In addition to these specific optimizations, several general considerations can help improve performance. Utilizing Cloud Monitoring to track metrics throughout your pipeline can identify where the most significant delays occur, allowing you to focus your optimization efforts effectively. Network latency can also be a contributing factor if your MySQL database and Google Cloud resources are in different regions. Ensuring that your resources are geographically closer to each other or exploring network optimization options can mitigate this issue. Finally, if your Cloud Function performs complex transformations, optimizing the code or offloading transformations to BigQuery using SQL can reduce processing time.

For instance, leveraging the maxConcurrentCdcTasks parameter in your Datastream configuration can provide a practical example of these optimizations. By experimenting with higher values, such as 5 or 10, and monitoring the load on your MySQL server, you can potentially speed up the initial capture process within Datastream, provided your MySQL server can handle the increased concurrency.

However, it is essential to monitor the impact of any changes on your entire system. Increasing concurrency or making other adjustments can sometimes have adverse effects if your resources are already strained. By carefully implementing and monitoring these optimizations, you should be able to reduce the latency in your data replication pipeline and achieve performance closer to your AWS setup.

@ms4446 
In some cases  file names is not visible or not coming in metadata or in logs in that case how  we can get file name exactly,for further data processing task.

In data processing workflows, having accurate and accessible file names is crucial for tracking and managing files. However, there are instances where file names may not be visible or available in metadata or logs, posing a challenge for further processing. To address this, several strategies can be employed to ensure that file names are accurately identified and retrievable.

One effective strategy is to embed unique identifiers within the file content itself. By including specific headers or footers containing the file name or other identifying information, you create a reliable internal reference that can be used when external metadata is lacking. This method ensures that even if the file name is not readily visible in logs or metadata, it can still be extracted directly from the file content.

Implementing consistent file naming conventions is another practical approach. By adopting a systematic naming pattern based on creation time, sequence, or other attributes, you can often deduce file names through inference. For example, files named with timestamps or sequential numbers can be identified based on their order of arrival or processing.

Maintaining a custom metadata repository is also highly beneficial. This involves logging file names and other attributes in a separate database or CSV file whenever files are created or processed. This repository serves as a centralized reference, allowing you to retrieve file names and associated metadata whenever needed. Such a system ensures that you have a reliable record of file information, even if it's not available in the primary logs or metadata.

Utilizing file system event monitoring tools or services can also capture file creation events in real-time. Tools like inotify on Linux or Cloud Functions triggered by GCS events can log file names and metadata at the time of file creation or upload. This proactive logging ensures that file names are recorded as soon as they enter the system.

Checksum or hash matching provides another layer of reliability. By calculating checksums or hashes (e.g., MD5, SHA-256) for files upon arrival or processing and storing these along with file names in a separate database, you create a robust method for file identification. Later, you can match these checksums to retrieve the corresponding file names, ensuring accuracy even when direct metadata is unavailable.

Cloud storage APIs offer additional tools for managing and retrieving file information. For instance, the Google Cloud Storage API allows you to list objects and retrieve their metadata. Using methods like list_objects, you can identify files based on other attributes if the file names are not directly visible. This method leverages the cloud provider's capabilities to manage and access stored data effectively.

To illustrate these strategies in practice, consider an example using Cloud Functions and GCS. You can set up a Cloud Function that triggers whenever a new file is uploaded to a GCS bucket. This function logs the file name and other relevant metadata, ensuring that the information is captured and stored for future reference. Here is a sample implementation:

import json
from google.cloud import storage

def log_file_metadata(data, context):
    """Background Cloud Function to be triggered by Cloud Storage.
    Args:
        data (dict): The Cloud Functions event payload.
        context (google.cloud.functions.Context): The Cloud Functions event metadata.
    """
    file_name = data['name']
    bucket_name = data['bucket']
    
    # Log file metadata
    log_entry = {
        'file_name': file_name,
        'bucket_name': bucket_name,
        'event_time': context.timestamp,
    }
    print(json.dumps(log_entry))

    # You can also store this metadata in a database for later retrieval
    store_metadata_in_db(log_entry)

def store_metadata_in_db(log_entry):
    # Implement your database storage logic here
    pass

This Cloud Function captures and logs the file name, bucket name, and event time whenever a file is uploaded. The logged metadata can be stored in a database for later retrieval, ensuring that you always have access to the necessary file information.

By embedding unique identifiers in file content, using consistent naming conventions, maintaining a custom metadata repository, leveraging file system event monitoring, employing checksum or hash matching, and utilizing cloud storage APIs, you can ensure that file names are accurately identified and retrievable for further data processing tasks.

I have increased maxConcurrentCdcTasks to 15, but it is still taking the same time to replicate data from MySQL to GCS.

The following two issues still persist:

  1. The file name is not consistent.
  2. There is latency in ETL.

Can you please help with these issues or suggest an alternative flow in GCS for replicating data from MySQL to BigQuery? I need data processing in between, as the file creation itself is taking more than 30 seconds.

In my case, I'm getting the full path, but in another case, it is not. I don't understand this problem.



file name is not consistent image as following:
file path log.png

 

@functions_framework.http
def lambda_handler(request):
    request_json = request.get_json(silent=True)
    print('request_json', type(request_json), request_json)
    def cgp_connection_credential_decode():
        try:
            decoded_credentials = base64.b64decode(GCP_CREDENTIALS_KEY).decode()
            credentials_info = json.loads(decoded_credentials)
            credentials = service_account.Credentials.from_service_account_info(credentials_info)
            return credentials
        except Exception as e:
            print('error:', e)

 

 

 

The inconsistency in file names within ETL processes can arise from various factors

Minimizing cold start times by keeping functions warm through periodic invocation, increasing memory allocation, and enabling parallel processing within the function can significantly improve efficiency. Additionally, using asynchronous processing where possible can enhance throughput and reduce latency.

Alternative Flow: Using Dataflow

Using Dataflow can provide a more efficient and scalable solution for your ETL pipeline. Here’s an alternative architecture:

  1. MySQL to GCS using Datastream:

    • Continue using Datastream to capture changes from MySQL and write them to GCS.

    • Ensure configurations are optimized (e.g., batch size, interval settings).

  2. GCS to Dataflow:

    • Set up a Dataflow pipeline to read files from GCS.

    • Dataflow can process the data in parallel, apply transformations, and write the results to BigQuery.

Detailed Steps

  1. Set Up Datastream:

    • Configure Datastream to capture changes from MySQL and write them to a GCS bucket.

    • Optimize Datastream settings as needed.

  2. Create a Dataflow Pipeline:

    • Dataflow can efficiently process and transform data. Here’s an example Dataflow pipeline in Python: 

      import apache_beam as beam
      from apache_beam.options.pipeline_options import PipelineOptions
      
      def process_file(element):
          # Implement your data processing logic here
          processed_element = element # Add your transformation logic
          return processed_element
      
      def run():
          pipeline_options = PipelineOptions(
              project='your-gcp-project',
              temp_location='gs://your-temp-bucket/temp',
              region='your-region'
          )
      
          with beam.Pipeline(options=pipeline_options) as p:
              (
                  p
                  | 'Read from GCS' >> beam.io.ReadFromText('gs://your-bucket/path/to/files/*')
                  | 'Process Data' >> beam.Map(process_file)
                  | 'Write to BigQuery' >> beam.io.WriteToBigQuery(
                      'your-project:your_dataset.your_table',
                      schema='SCHEMA_AUTODETECT',
                      write_disposition=beam.io.BigQueryDisposition.WRITE_APPEND
                  )
              )
      
      if __name__ == '__main__':
          run()
      
  3. Deploy and Monitor:

    • Deploy the Dataflow job and monitor it using the Dataflow console in Google Cloud.
    • Use Cloud Monitoring and Cloud Logging to keep track of the pipeline’s performance and troubleshoot any issues.

Adopting Google Cloud Dataflow for ETL tasks offers several key benefits:

Dataflow efficiently handles both batch and stream processing, ensuring the system can scale as data volumes grow without compromising performance.

Leveraging parallel processing and optimized configurations, Dataflow reduces latency, enabling quicker data transformation and loading. This results in faster access to up-to-date information, even for large datasets.

Dataflow allows for the easy implementation of complex transformations and processing logic within the pipeline. Its comprehensive features enable the design of intricate data pipelines that meet specific business needs without extensive customization.

Thank you for the guidance.!