Hi everyone,
I’m operating a CBSD using Google SAS within a DPA (Dynamic Protection Area) zone and I’ve encountered some puzzling behavior:
Often, the frequency I request via the domain proxy is not granted. Instead, SAS grants a different frequency.
In some cases, even after a grant is issued, it is later moved to a different frequency.
Additionally, I’ve observed that even the newly granted frequency may be revoked shortly after—especially when the DPA activates.
I’m trying to understand what’s happening here. A few questions:
Does Google SAS internally prioritize certain frequencies over others, perhaps based on its interference calculations or protection algorithms?
Is it avoiding frequencies that are likely to be on the DPA move list, hence auto-assigning something “safer”?
Why might even an alternate frequency grant be short-lived or suspended?
Any insights from others who’ve operated radios in DPA zones or with Google SAS would be appreciated. Documentation references or links are also welcome. Also if we can get any historical DPA event related data wrt a location that can help in choosing frequency, it would be super helpful.
Thanks!
The SAS doesn't issue grants independently. Any grants your DP gets from the SAS, it has to request and specify the channel(s). If your DP is losing grants due to DPA suspensions or getting grants on unexpected frequencies, that is almost certainly because your DP is manually requesting grants on new frequencies.
Google SAS does prioritize spectrum inquiry results based on estimated channel quality. it tries to take into account both available max EIRP and interference from other CBRS users in the area when prioritizing channels. The channels with the highest channel quality are generally prioritized first in the SI results.
The main takeaway here is this: your DP is the one that is in charge of requesting grants and specifying the frequencies of those grants. It also decides how long to keep those grants. Google SAS will occasionally terminate grants, but these grant terminations only happen a single time a day: at the end of CPAS. These grant terminations usually occur because of a PPA in the area, not a DPA. The behavior you are describing sounds like you are losing grants much more often than that. That's indicative that this is something that your DP is choosing to do. If you want to know why your DP is choosing to behave in this manner, your device vendor is likely going to be the best place to ask.
Thanks for the response. I have a follow-up question:
Does the spectrum inquiry ranking of channels also factor in the historical DPA or PPA activity on those frequencies? For example, do channels that have had frequent DPA/PPA-related suspensions show up lower in the spectrum inquiry results?
Also, is there any way to pre-check a location (before deploying a CBSD) to estimate the likelihood of it being impacted by DPA or PPA activity—maybe based on past events or any insights exposed by the SAS? This would help in planning in coastal or sensitive areas.
Would appreciate any pointers or clarification.
It's important to remember that DPAs and PPAs are distinct and managed differently:
Regarding Dynamic Protection Areas (DPAs):
Regarding PAL Protection Areas (PPAs):
Hope this helps!