PAGE BREAKS IN PDF ERROR- UNMATCHED END

NAME : <<Start:FILTER(

 "task_mngt",

 [task_mngt_id]=MAXROW(

 "task_mngt",

 "_RowNumber",

AND(

 [name]=[_THISROW-1].[name],

 [department_id]=1

)

 )

)>><<[name]>>

 

<<Start:FILTER(

 "task_mngt",

 [task_mngt_id]=MAXROW(

 "task_mngt",

 "_RowNumber",

 AND(

   [name]=[_THISROW-2].[name],

   [status]=[_THISROW-1].[status],

   [department_id]=1

  )

 )

)>>

 

<<[status]>>

TASK

INITIAL TARGET

<<Start:FILTER(

 "task_mngt",

 AND(

   [name]=[_THISROW-2].[name],

   [status]=[_THISROW-1].[status],

[department_id]=1

 )

)

>><<[main_task_name]>>

<<[task_target_date]>><<end>>

 

<<End>>

<<End>>

@SkrOYC @Steve please help me finding this error. Thanks

 

chiukim_0-1671612536628.png

 

Solved Solved
0 6 200
1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

So I think this is to do with the general layout of your template.  Its says it can't find the 3 <<START: sections, which is weird.  But I've had this before and sometimes its a formatting error where its not reading carriage returns right.

What I'd do is to build it in stages.  Get your first start command working.  Then add the second inside that one. 

But also, all 3 start commands are referencing the same table?  Why do you need them grouping this way?  Normally I'd do this with formulas in the template.

View solution in original post

6 REPLIES 6

So I think this is to do with the general layout of your template.  Its says it can't find the 3 <<START: sections, which is weird.  But I've had this before and sometimes its a formatting error where its not reading carriage returns right.

What I'd do is to build it in stages.  Get your first start command working.  Then add the second inside that one. 

But also, all 3 start commands are referencing the same table?  Why do you need them grouping this way?  Normally I'd do this with formulas in the template.

Yes all the start commands refer to the same table. I really wanted to just group my data per employee and the status of their task. 

So that would only need two start commands.  Or just one if you were happy for the data to look like

User     Task
User1 Task1
User1 Task2
User1 Task3
User2 Task1
User2 Task2
User2 Task3

 

 

User     Task     Status  
User1 Task1 Done
User1 Task2 Pending
User1 Task3 Done
User2 Task1 Done
User2 Task2 Done
User2 Task3 Pending

User 1

Done Task

Task 1 

Task 3

Pending Task

Task 2

 

 

I want my report to look like this, 

Do you have seperate user and task tables?

It's okay now. I follow your advise. Thanks

Top Labels in this Space