Hi, I want to use `database_flags` in terraform resource of `google_alloydb_instance`.
According to the document, you can use `database_flags` in `google_alloydb_instance`, isn't it?
If so, could you tell me some examples of using `database_flags` ?
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi, @ms4446 .
I tried to `terraform apply`, and I got an error saying that the type of `database_flags` is map of string, and when I wrote the following code, it worked out.
resource "google_alloydb_instance" "main" {
cluster = google_alloydb_cluster.main.name
instance_id = "${var.project_id}-alloydb-instance"
instance_type = "PRIMARY"
database_flags = {
"alloydb.logical_decoding" = "on"
}
depends_on = [google_service_networking_connection.vpc_connection]
}
Yes, AlloyDB is a managed database service from that is fully compatible Postgres.
For example, for Postgres, some common flags include:
max_connections
: The maximum number of concurrent connections to the database.shared_buffers
: The amount of memory the database uses for shared memory buffers.work_mem
: The amount of memory used by internal sort operations and hash tables.Here is an example of using database_flags
with AlloyDB instance in Terraform:
resource "google_alloydb_instance" "default" {
name = "test-alloydb-instance"
project = "my-gcp-project"
region = "us-central1"
database_version = "POSTGRES_13"
settings {
tier = "db-f1-micro"
database_flags {
name = "max_connections"
value = "100"
}
database_flags {
name = "shared_buffers"
value = "256MB"
}
}
}
Hi, @ms4446. Thank you for your response.
Based on the example code you provided, should database_flags be written similarly to google_sql_database_instance?
Am I correct in understanding that database_flags is nested within the settings?
thanks.
Yes, that's correct. The database_flags
block should be nested within the settings
block, similar to the google_sql_database_instance
resource. This is a typical pattern for Terraform resources where certain settings are grouped under a common block.
Thanks a lot!
Hi, @ms4446
terraform resource "google_alloydb_instance" "default" { name = "test-alloydb-instance" settings { tier = "db-f1-micro" database_flags { name = "max_connections" value = "100" } database_flags { name = "shared_buffers" value = "256MB" } } }
╷ │ Error: Unsupported block type │ │ on ./alloydb/main.tf line 108, in resource "google_alloydb_instance" "default": │ 108: settings { │ │ Blocks of type "settings" are not expected here.
terraform resource "google_alloydb_instance" "default" { name = "test-alloydb-instance" database_flags { name = "max_connections" value = "100" } }
╷ │ Error: Unsupported block type │ │ on ./alloydb/main.tf line 108, in resource "google_alloydb_instance" "default": │ 108: database_flags { │ │ Blocks of type "database_flags" are not expected here. Did you mean to define argument "database_flags"? If so, use the equals sign to assign it a value.
terraform resource "google_alloydb_instance" "default" { name = "test-alloydb-instance" database_flags = { max_connections = "100" } }
thanks for replying.
Sorry for the confusion. Upon further research the google_alloydb_instance
resource does indeed support the database_flags
argument. However, it is directly nested under the instance resource and not under any subblock like settings
.
Here is an example of the proper syntax:
resource "google_alloydb_instance" "primary" {
cluster = google_alloydb_cluster.default.name
instance_id = "your-instance-id"
instance_type = "PRIMARY"
display_name = "your-instance-display-name"
database_flags = [
{
name = "max_connections"
value = "100"
},
{
name = "shared_buffers"
value = "256MB"
}
]
# other arguments...
}
Please note that the values of database_flags
are provided as a list of maps, where each map contains a name
and a value
. Ensure that the flags you use are compatible with the database engine in use (PostgreSQL in your case).
In the example code from the official repository, the database_flags
argument and its value are provided via variables. If you're still encountering errors, you may want to ensure that you have correctly defined and provided these variables.
Lastly, in the AlloyDB module, the creation of an AlloyDB instance is split into two separate resource blocks: one for the AlloyDB cluster (google_alloydb_cluster
) and one for the AlloyDB instance (google_alloydb_instance
). The instance is associated with the cluster via the cluster
argument, which is set to the name of the google_alloydb_cluster
resource. Make sure your Terraform configuration reflects this structure
For more more details please refer to the official GoogleCloudPlatform repository for AlloyDB
Hi, @ms4446 .
I tried to `terraform apply`, and I got an error saying that the type of `database_flags` is map of string, and when I wrote the following code, it worked out.
resource "google_alloydb_instance" "main" {
cluster = google_alloydb_cluster.main.name
instance_id = "${var.project_id}-alloydb-instance"
instance_type = "PRIMARY"
database_flags = {
"alloydb.logical_decoding" = "on"
}
depends_on = [google_service_networking_connection.vpc_connection]
}