Hello,
I was trying out the ‘Merge Results’ functionality in an Explore and I couldn’t make it work properly for large tables.
It seems that the row limit (5k maximum) applied in the individual explore results are affecting the ability to merge them together.
As an example: suppose I want to merge an explore with two dimensions (uuid, name) with an identical copy of itself (still uuid, name) on uuid=uuid.
This works perfectly as long as I order the two explores the same way (by clicking on the uuid header).
If I invert the ordering between the two columns (the first explore is ascending, the second is descending) suddenly my merge result will contain all nulls for the second explore.
As mentioned above, my hypothesis is that the row limit is applied individually to both explores before the merge meaning that, unless ordered the same way, the second explore may not have the necessary uuids in its first [limit] rows.
Could someone help me confirm whether this is a bug or if its actually the intended behaviour?
Best,
Federico
edit: typos