Hi all,
With GKE evolving at an impressive pace, I wanted to raise a provocative question:
Are we over-engineering Kubernetes setups when simpler solutions might do the job?
A few discussion starters:
How do you decide when Kubernetes is the right tool versus when a simpler PaaS or even serverless service would be more efficient?
Have tools like autopilot mode, node auto-provisioning, and multi-cluster support made your life easier — or added new layers of complexity?
What’s your favorite “hack” or unconventional use of GKE that’s saved you time, money, or headaches?
Let’s share some hard-earned lessons and maybe even challenge each other’s assumptions.
Looking forward to your thoughts.
Best,
Aleksei
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @a_aleinikov,
Welcome to Google Cloud Community!
Let's get into these questions:
1. How do you decide when Kubernetes is the right tool versus when a simpler PaaS or even serverless service would be more efficient?
GKE |
PaaS |
Serverless |
|
Application Complexity |
High: Complex microservices, stateful applications, custom networking, specific OS dependencies. |
Medium: Web apps, APIs, stateless services, common runtimes. |
Low: Event-driven, single-purpose functions, simple APIs. |
Control & Customization |
Maximum: Node config, kernel params (GKE Standard), specific sidecars, intricate network policies, custom schedulers. |
Moderate: Runtime versions, scaling params, some environment config. |
Minimal: Runtime, memory, triggers. |
Statefulness |
Excellent support for stateful sets, persistent volumes, databases in-cluster. |
Limited: Best for stateless. Can connect to external databases. |
Designed for stateless. State must be externalized. |
Cost Model |
Pay for nodes (Standard) or Pod resources (Autopilot), control plane. Potential for idle resources. |
Pay for instances running or requests served. |
Pay per invocation and execution time. Can be very cost-effective for spiky workloads. |
Specific Needs |
GPUs, TPUs, specific machine types, long-running background tasks without HTTP triggers. |
Standard web protocols, background tasks with limitations. |
Short-lived, event-triggered tasks. |
2. Have tools like autopilot mode, node auto-provisioning, and multi-cluster support made your life easier — or added new layers of complexity?
3. What’s your favorite “hack” or unconventional use of GKE that’s saved you time, money, or headaches?
Was this helpful? If so, please accept this answer as “Solution”. If you need additional assistance, reply here within 2 business days and I’ll be happy to help.
Hi @a_aleinikov,
Welcome to Google Cloud Community!
Let's get into these questions:
1. How do you decide when Kubernetes is the right tool versus when a simpler PaaS or even serverless service would be more efficient?
GKE |
PaaS |
Serverless |
|
Application Complexity |
High: Complex microservices, stateful applications, custom networking, specific OS dependencies. |
Medium: Web apps, APIs, stateless services, common runtimes. |
Low: Event-driven, single-purpose functions, simple APIs. |
Control & Customization |
Maximum: Node config, kernel params (GKE Standard), specific sidecars, intricate network policies, custom schedulers. |
Moderate: Runtime versions, scaling params, some environment config. |
Minimal: Runtime, memory, triggers. |
Statefulness |
Excellent support for stateful sets, persistent volumes, databases in-cluster. |
Limited: Best for stateless. Can connect to external databases. |
Designed for stateless. State must be externalized. |
Cost Model |
Pay for nodes (Standard) or Pod resources (Autopilot), control plane. Potential for idle resources. |
Pay for instances running or requests served. |
Pay per invocation and execution time. Can be very cost-effective for spiky workloads. |
Specific Needs |
GPUs, TPUs, specific machine types, long-running background tasks without HTTP triggers. |
Standard web protocols, background tasks with limitations. |
Short-lived, event-triggered tasks. |
2. Have tools like autopilot mode, node auto-provisioning, and multi-cluster support made your life easier — or added new layers of complexity?
3. What’s your favorite “hack” or unconventional use of GKE that’s saved you time, money, or headaches?
Was this helpful? If so, please accept this answer as “Solution”. If you need additional assistance, reply here within 2 business days and I’ll be happy to help.