特定の画面へ移行させないように方法をご教授いただけません。
通常の場合、リストを開くと詳細画面へ進みかと思いますが、
移行させたくない場合はどのような処置が必要ですか?
ビュー設定の動作→アプリリンクの箇所で移行先を制限できればいいのかと思いますが、
Solved! Go to Solution.
Please refer the following practical tip from @Koichi_Tsuji .
Click Table View row item, but do nothing (not ope... - Google Cloud Community
Hi @TeeSee1 ,
If I remember correctly, moving to the same with with an action introduces a momentary visual glitch. This is so because the action does move to the same view again- this means even though the view is retained, the user sees a momentary movement on the screen. You may want to test it. With Koichi's tip of creating a group action with no constituent actions and then to put the empty group action as a row select action, the user experience is seamless- nothing happens on clicking a row.
When I tested with an action to move onto itself, I did not see any 'glitches' on the screen. Maybe under certain conditions, glitches may be observed. To be safe than sorry, I agree to go with the no action grouped action approach! Thanks again for making me aware of this tip! @Suvrutt_Gurjar
画面ごとに権限を振り分けることで遷移させないことに成功できました!
ありがとうございました!
一つのやり方として、自身(リスト)に移動するアクションを定義して、Row Selectedのイベントにそのアクションを設定するやり方があるかと。
画面ごとに権限を振り分けることで遷移させないことに成功できました!
ありがとうございました!
Please refer the following practical tip from @Koichi_Tsuji .
Click Table View row item, but do nothing (not ope... - Google Cloud Community
Hi @TeeSee1 ,
If I remember correctly, moving to the same with with an action introduces a momentary visual glitch. This is so because the action does move to the same view again- this means even though the view is retained, the user sees a momentary movement on the screen. You may want to test it. With Koichi's tip of creating a group action with no constituent actions and then to put the empty group action as a row select action, the user experience is seamless- nothing happens on clicking a row.
When I tested with an action to move onto itself, I did not see any 'glitches' on the screen. Maybe under certain conditions, glitches may be observed. To be safe than sorry, I agree to go with the no action grouped action approach! Thanks again for making me aware of this tip! @Suvrutt_Gurjar
User | Count |
---|---|
18 | |
14 | |
11 | |
7 | |
4 |